https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189461 When parties specifically refer a pure question of law to an arbitrator for final decision, including one going to the scope of the arbitration agreement, that question is not reopened merely because a court thinks the legal conclusion is wrong. The distinction is drawn between legal questions arising incidentally and those deliberately submitted for decision; only the latter are treated as conclusively decided by the award. A broadly framed arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or relating to the contract was also held wide enough to include a contractor's claim for increased cost of imported equipment and technical know-how, because the claim depended on the contractual bargain and its execution. en-us Tue, 06 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:37:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189461 When parties specifically refer a pure question of law to an arbitrator for final decision, including one going to the scope of the arbitration agreement, that question is not reopened merely because a court thinks the legal conclusion is wrong. The distinction is drawn between legal questions arising incidentally and those deliberately submitted for decision; only the latter are treated as conclusively decided by the award. A broadly framed arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or relating to the contract was also held wide enough to include a contractor's claim for increased cost of imported equipment and technical know-how, because the claim depended on the contractual bargain and its execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189461