<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 565 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the assessment order for AY 2009-10, deleting the addition of Rs. 25,07,700 as unexplained cash deposit in the Andhra Bank account. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the deposit as proceeds from the sale of agricultural land, supported by documentary evidence. The addition made by the CIT(A) was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 565 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the assessment order for AY 2009-10, deleting the addition of Rs. 25,07,700 as unexplained cash deposit in the Andhra Bank account. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the deposit as proceeds from the sale of agricultural land, supported by documentary evidence. The addition made by the CIT(A) was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>