<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 558 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to grant a deduction under Section 54F for the investment in the Magadi Road property. The judgment highlighted the need for sufficient evidence to support deductions under Sections 54 and 54F and clarified the definition of a &quot;residential house&quot; for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 558 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to grant a deduction under Section 54F for the investment in the Magadi Road property. The judgment highlighted the need for sufficient evidence to support deductions under Sections 54 and 54F and clarified the definition of a &quot;residential house&quot; for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>