<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 552 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake filed by the Revenue against the order dated 08/08/2016. The Tribunal found no error in the order and clarified that the disputed paragraph was in line with the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in the appellant&#039;s case. A new paragraph was added to the order, directing the Central Excise officer to decide the case as per the High Court&#039;s directions. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the arguments presented, upholding legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 552 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake filed by the Revenue against the order dated 08/08/2016. The Tribunal found no error in the order and clarified that the disputed paragraph was in line with the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in the appellant&#039;s case. A new paragraph was added to the order, directing the Central Excise officer to decide the case as per the High Court&#039;s directions. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the arguments presented, upholding legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>