<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 526 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, granting the refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid on imported goods under Notification No. 102/07-Cus. The Tribunal held that the time limit for filing the refund application in provisional assessment cases should start from the finalization date, as per Circular No. 23/2010-Cus, contrary to the rejection based on a one-year time frame from the date of duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 526 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, granting the refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid on imported goods under Notification No. 102/07-Cus. The Tribunal held that the time limit for filing the refund application in provisional assessment cases should start from the finalization date, as per Circular No. 23/2010-Cus, contrary to the rejection based on a one-year time frame from the date of duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>