<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1504 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189429</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India oversaw the progress of the 2G Spectrum case, with reports from investigative agencies reviewed in court. The Court expressed satisfaction with the attention given to the case and suggested establishing a separate Special Court for 2G Spectrum cases. The case was adjourned to allow time for consultation on this proposal. To maintain the integrity of the investigation, the Court directed that no other court should interfere with ongoing investigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1504 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189429</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India oversaw the progress of the 2G Spectrum case, with reports from investigative agencies reviewed in court. The Court expressed satisfaction with the attention given to the case and suggested establishing a separate Special Court for 2G Spectrum cases. The case was adjourned to allow time for consultation on this proposal. To maintain the integrity of the investigation, the Court directed that no other court should interfere with ongoing investigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>