https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189422 A belated plea that the notice terminating the contractual tenancy was invalid could not be entertained where it was omitted from the original written statement, introduced only after about eight years by amendment, and treated as abandoned before the Rent Control Tribunal. Although a pure question of law may sometimes be raised later, the tenant's conduct, the long delay, and the prejudice to the landlord were decisive: an earlier objection could have been met by withdrawing the eviction petition and issuing a fresh notice. The Supreme Court therefore refused to permit the technical objection and restored the eviction order in favour of the landlord. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:59:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189422 A belated plea that the notice terminating the contractual tenancy was invalid could not be entertained where it was omitted from the original written statement, introduced only after about eight years by amendment, and treated as abandoned before the Rent Control Tribunal. Although a pure question of law may sometimes be raised later, the tenant's conduct, the long delay, and the prejudice to the landlord were decisive: an earlier objection could have been met by withdrawing the eviction petition and issuing a fresh notice. The Supreme Court therefore refused to permit the technical objection and restored the eviction order in favour of the landlord. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189422