https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189421 Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and complaints under Section 33A were discussed in the context of interim awards directing payment of half wages, including dearness allowance, to workmen during pendency of the dispute. The appellant objected that no proper opportunity was given to file objections and disputed knowledge of the applications, while the workmen maintained that copies had been served and the appellant had time to respond. Without determining the factual controversy, the Supreme Court modified the interim direction by requiring the sums to be released only against security to the satisfaction of the Industrial Tribunal, and directed expeditious disposal of the main complaints. en-us Wed, 22 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189421 Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and complaints under Section 33A were discussed in the context of interim awards directing payment of half wages, including dearness allowance, to workmen during pendency of the dispute. The appellant objected that no proper opportunity was given to file objections and disputed knowledge of the applications, while the workmen maintained that copies had been served and the appellant had time to respond. Without determining the factual controversy, the Supreme Court modified the interim direction by requiring the sums to be released only against security to the satisfaction of the Industrial Tribunal, and directed expeditious disposal of the main complaints. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189421