<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) wrongly classified share gains based on a 30-day holding period; not supported by law.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32799</link>
    <description>Mere fact that the assessee has also quickly sold shares in some instances within the short interval would not ipso facto lead to a conclusion that the assessee was a trader in the shares. The action of the CIT(A) in bifurcating the gains based on the period of holding of less than 30 days and more than 30 days is not supportable by the scheme of the Act. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:27:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) wrongly classified share gains based on a 30-day holding period; not supported by law.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32799</link>
      <description>Mere fact that the assessee has also quickly sold shares in some instances within the short interval would not ipso facto lead to a conclusion that the assessee was a trader in the shares. The action of the CIT(A) in bifurcating the gains based on the period of holding of less than 30 days and more than 30 days is not supportable by the scheme of the Act. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:27:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>