<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 514 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337434</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, unaccounted purchases, excess stock, and seized records can support additions where the assessee fails to produce timely and reliable evidence to explain source, valuation, or reconciliation. The Delhi High Court noted that unexplained raw-material investment and related profit could not be deleted when search material showed off-book purchases and sales, and later invoices were treated as an afterthought. It also upheld the addition for excess stock because the assessee&#039;s private valuation was belated and unverified. Finally, it sustained the addition based on a director&#039;s statement and seized documents, which corroborated the profit workings and quantities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 514 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337434</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, unaccounted purchases, excess stock, and seized records can support additions where the assessee fails to produce timely and reliable evidence to explain source, valuation, or reconciliation. The Delhi High Court noted that unexplained raw-material investment and related profit could not be deleted when search material showed off-book purchases and sales, and later invoices were treated as an afterthought. It also upheld the addition for excess stock because the assessee&#039;s private valuation was belated and unverified. Finally, it sustained the addition based on a director&#039;s statement and seized documents, which corroborated the profit workings and quantities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>