https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337421 The tribunal found the impugned order lacking in a detailed examination of the classification of services rendered by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of correct classification for tax liability and treatment of reimbursable expenditures. The appellants successfully argued that reimbursable expenditures should be excluded from the taxable value, providing supporting evidence. The tribunal highlighted the need for verification of the evidence. The matter was remanded back to the Original Authority for a fresh decision, with directions to examine the time bar issue raised by the appellants, granting them an opportunity to present their case adequately. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337421 The tribunal found the impugned order lacking in a detailed examination of the classification of services rendered by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of correct classification for tax liability and treatment of reimbursable expenditures. The appellants successfully argued that reimbursable expenditures should be excluded from the taxable value, providing supporting evidence. The tribunal highlighted the need for verification of the evidence. The matter was remanded back to the Original Authority for a fresh decision, with directions to examine the time bar issue raised by the appellants, granting them an opportunity to present their case adequately. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337421