<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 497 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337417</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise (Appeals) upheld the original classification of FIBC Bags under CETSH 6305 32 00, rejecting the re-classification by lower authorities. Subsequent show cause notices were issued, but the High Court directed a fair consideration of the matter. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the validity of show cause notices was supported by previous orders, leading to the High Court granting a Writ of Mandamus for the 3rd respondent to finalize the classification within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 497 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337417</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise (Appeals) upheld the original classification of FIBC Bags under CETSH 6305 32 00, rejecting the re-classification by lower authorities. Subsequent show cause notices were issued, but the High Court directed a fair consideration of the matter. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the validity of show cause notices was supported by previous orders, leading to the High Court granting a Writ of Mandamus for the 3rd respondent to finalize the classification within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>