<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 494 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337414</link>
    <description>The tribunal waived the penalty imposed under section 11AC on the appellant for the misclassification of Soya Gum, as the appellant paid the differential duty and interest before the Show Cause Notice was issued. The judgment underscores the significance of precise product classification and description for excise duty, emphasizing the repercussions of misstatement or suppression of facts, and elucidating the penalty imposition provisions in such scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 494 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337414</link>
      <description>The tribunal waived the penalty imposed under section 11AC on the appellant for the misclassification of Soya Gum, as the appellant paid the differential duty and interest before the Show Cause Notice was issued. The judgment underscores the significance of precise product classification and description for excise duty, emphasizing the repercussions of misstatement or suppression of facts, and elucidating the penalty imposition provisions in such scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>