https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337413 The appellate tribunal set aside the charge of clandestine removal of goods due to insufficient evidence, except for confirming duty demand related to a shortage of finished goods. The decision was based on the lack of positive evidence supporting the allegation, leading to duty demand confirmation with interest and penalty imposition on all appellants. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and noted discrepancies in the investigation, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants on the main charge. en-us Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337413 The appellate tribunal set aside the charge of clandestine removal of goods due to insufficient evidence, except for confirming duty demand related to a shortage of finished goods. The decision was based on the lack of positive evidence supporting the allegation, leading to duty demand confirmation with interest and penalty imposition on all appellants. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and noted discrepancies in the investigation, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants on the main charge. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337413