<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 492 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption granted by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning the classification of cakes, pastries, and cookies under Central Excise Tariff Heading 19059010 and the denial of SSI exemption under notification No. 8/2003. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to accurately determine the value of excisable goods for SSI exemption eligibility, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of specificity in establishing that the value of clearances exceeded the limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 492 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption granted by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning the classification of cakes, pastries, and cookies under Central Excise Tariff Heading 19059010 and the denial of SSI exemption under notification No. 8/2003. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to accurately determine the value of excisable goods for SSI exemption eligibility, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of specificity in establishing that the value of clearances exceeded the limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>