<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 490 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337410</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was held inadmissible on stainless steel plates procured for manufacture of capital goods and later cleared as such without being used in manufacture. The CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 are confined to goods used in relation to manufacture, and the special treatment for inputs and capital goods under Rule 2(k) cannot be extended to items acquired for making capital goods and then removed unchanged. Earlier decisions and administrative clarification did not address this precise question, and the statutory scheme could not be expanded to bypass the limits attached to inputs and capital goods. The Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 22:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 490 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337410</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was held inadmissible on stainless steel plates procured for manufacture of capital goods and later cleared as such without being used in manufacture. The CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 are confined to goods used in relation to manufacture, and the special treatment for inputs and capital goods under Rule 2(k) cannot be extended to items acquired for making capital goods and then removed unchanged. Earlier decisions and administrative clarification did not address this precise question, and the statutory scheme could not be expanded to bypass the limits attached to inputs and capital goods. The Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>