<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 476 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337396</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to pay the deficit court fee within the time granted by the Chamber Judge. The Court noted the absence of any representative for the petitioner and the failure of counsel to take steps to comply with the earlier payment direction, so no further adjudication was undertaken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 476 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337396</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to pay the deficit court fee within the time granted by the Chamber Judge. The Court noted the absence of any representative for the petitioner and the failure of counsel to take steps to comply with the earlier payment direction, so no further adjudication was undertaken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>