<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 466 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of the Commr. of Customs, Patna, dropping proceedings against the respondents. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence to establish illegal export to Nepal, discrepancies in the investigation, and unchallenged findings of the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and proper investigation under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 466 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of the Commr. of Customs, Patna, dropping proceedings against the respondents. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence to establish illegal export to Nepal, discrepancies in the investigation, and unchallenged findings of the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and proper investigation under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>