<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 465 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on the assessable value violation but found the redemption fine excessive. The usual redemption fine of 20% of the enhanced value was reduced from 11 lakhs to 4 lakhs. The penalty of 50,000 imposed on the appellant was upheld. The appeal was disposed of by reducing the redemption fine to 4 lakhs and maintaining the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 465 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on the assessable value violation but found the redemption fine excessive. The usual redemption fine of 20% of the enhanced value was reduced from 11 lakhs to 4 lakhs. The penalty of 50,000 imposed on the appellant was upheld. The appeal was disposed of by reducing the redemption fine to 4 lakhs and maintaining the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>