https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337381 Writ challenges to enforcement summons, notices, search and seizure measures, and a request for return of seized documents were held not maintainable where the underlying Aircel-Maxis and FIPB-related investigation was still in progress and under Supreme Court monitoring. The HC held that it should not entertain proceedings that would directly or indirectly impede an ongoing criminal investigation, especially after the competent court had permitted further investigation and supplementary complaints. Objections that no predicate offence had been established, that the petitioners were not shown as accused, and that the summons and notices were unreasoned were treated as premature. The request for return of seized documents also failed as it was consequential to the search challenge. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:23:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337381 Writ challenges to enforcement summons, notices, search and seizure measures, and a request for return of seized documents were held not maintainable where the underlying Aircel-Maxis and FIPB-related investigation was still in progress and under Supreme Court monitoring. The HC held that it should not entertain proceedings that would directly or indirectly impede an ongoing criminal investigation, especially after the competent court had permitted further investigation and supplementary complaints. Objections that no predicate offence had been established, that the petitioners were not shown as accused, and that the summons and notices were unreasoned were treated as premature. The request for return of seized documents also failed as it was consequential to the search challenge. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337381