https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189414 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that they were entitled to the benefits under the North-Eastern Industrial Policy (NEIP), 1997, and subsequent notifications until the promised period expired. The notification dated 1-3-2007 was set aside for lacking a valid public interest justification, and the benefits were to continue as per the original promise, subject to compliance with the conditions laid down in the relevant notifications. en-us Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:21:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189414 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that they were entitled to the benefits under the North-Eastern Industrial Policy (NEIP), 1997, and subsequent notifications until the promised period expired. The notification dated 1-3-2007 was set aside for lacking a valid public interest justification, and the benefits were to continue as per the original promise, subject to compliance with the conditions laid down in the relevant notifications. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189414