<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1145 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189416</link>
    <description>Central excise dispute before the Supreme Court resulted in dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal, as the Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The text records only that the matter was heard and that the existing decision was left undisturbed. No further legal reasoning, issue-specific analysis, or statutory interpretation is provided in the supplied material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1145 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189416</link>
      <description>Central excise dispute before the Supreme Court resulted in dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal, as the Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The text records only that the matter was heard and that the existing decision was left undisturbed. No further legal reasoning, issue-specific analysis, or statutory interpretation is provided in the supplied material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>