<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1246 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189418</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal at Ahmedabad partially allowed the appeal, citing the retrospective applicability of the amendment in Section 40(a)(ia) brought in by Finance (No.2) Act, 2014. The disallowance under Sec. 40(a)(ia) was restricted to 30% of the amount, in line with the clarificatory nature of the amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1246 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189418</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal at Ahmedabad partially allowed the appeal, citing the retrospective applicability of the amendment in Section 40(a)(ia) brought in by Finance (No.2) Act, 2014. The disallowance under Sec. 40(a)(ia) was restricted to 30% of the amount, in line with the clarificatory nature of the amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>