<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1262 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting exemption under Section 11 to the assessee, emphasizing that charging fees does not automatically disqualify activities as charitable. The issue of expenditure disallowance was remitted back to the AO for verification, highlighting the importance of proper record-keeping. The claim for depreciation disallowance was rejected by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1262 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting exemption under Section 11 to the assessee, emphasizing that charging fees does not automatically disqualify activities as charitable. The issue of expenditure disallowance was remitted back to the AO for verification, highlighting the importance of proper record-keeping. The claim for depreciation disallowance was rejected by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>