https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189410 The Tribunal partly allowed the Appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee on several grounds, including procedural irregularities, depreciation rates, expense disallowances, and penalty proceedings. The Assessee's contentions regarding violation of natural justice principles, discrepancies in notice service, lower depreciation rate on CCTV cameras, disallowance of advertisement expenses, adhoc disallowance of expenses, disallowance of donation, and deduction under Section 80G were considered. The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's arguments and provided relief accordingly, citing legal precedents and evidence to support their decision. en-us Sun, 03 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:21:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189410 The Tribunal partly allowed the Appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee on several grounds, including procedural irregularities, depreciation rates, expense disallowances, and penalty proceedings. The Assessee's contentions regarding violation of natural justice principles, discrepancies in notice service, lower depreciation rate on CCTV cameras, disallowance of advertisement expenses, adhoc disallowance of expenses, disallowance of donation, and deduction under Section 80G were considered. The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's arguments and provided relief accordingly, citing legal precedents and evidence to support their decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Sun, 03 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189410