https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189411 The Tribunal accepted the appellant's explanation for the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal, citing the liberal approach of the Supreme Court. It held jurisdiction over the appeal as the order was issued by the Commissioner of Customs, an adjudicating authority under the Customs Act. The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for early hearing and stay on the revocation of the courier license, emphasizing the importance of balancing the parties' rights. Ultimately, the Tribunal ordered the condonation of delay, accepted the appeal, and scheduled further proceedings for the stay and early hearing application. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:21:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189411 The Tribunal accepted the appellant's explanation for the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal, citing the liberal approach of the Supreme Court. It held jurisdiction over the appeal as the order was issued by the Commissioner of Customs, an adjudicating authority under the Customs Act. The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for early hearing and stay on the revocation of the courier license, emphasizing the importance of balancing the parties' rights. Ultimately, the Tribunal ordered the condonation of delay, accepted the appeal, and scheduled further proceedings for the stay and early hearing application. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189411