<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 459 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337379</link>
    <description>The case involved issues regarding the interpretation of excise duty notifications, tax liability on free supply of rails by Railways, allegations of evasion of excise duty, liability for penalties under the Central Excise Act, and the constitutional validity of certain provisions. The judgment resolved these issues by considering clarifications in subsequent notifications and amendments in the Finance Bill, 2015. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential benefits to the appellant based on the settled issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 459 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337379</link>
      <description>The case involved issues regarding the interpretation of excise duty notifications, tax liability on free supply of rails by Railways, allegations of evasion of excise duty, liability for penalties under the Central Excise Act, and the constitutional validity of certain provisions. The judgment resolved these issues by considering clarifications in subsequent notifications and amendments in the Finance Bill, 2015. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential benefits to the appellant based on the settled issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>