<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (9) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189399</link>
    <description>In bail applications, the threshold question is whether the alleged offence is bailable or non-bailable; if non-bailable, the court must assess gravity, evidence, the accused&#039;s character and circumstances, flight risk, witness interference, and the wider interests of the State. The High Court erred by granting bail without first proceeding on the footing that the prosecution case disclosed a non-bailable offence and by relying mainly on parity with co-accused, absence of flight risk, and expected trial delay. The alleged offence was of grave character affecting State security, and the commitment order indicated a prima facie case under the non-bailable provision. The grant of bail was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (9) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189399</link>
      <description>In bail applications, the threshold question is whether the alleged offence is bailable or non-bailable; if non-bailable, the court must assess gravity, evidence, the accused&#039;s character and circumstances, flight risk, witness interference, and the wider interests of the State. The High Court erred by granting bail without first proceeding on the footing that the prosecution case disclosed a non-bailable offence and by relying mainly on parity with co-accused, absence of flight risk, and expected trial delay. The alleged offence was of grave character affecting State security, and the commitment order indicated a prima facie case under the non-bailable provision. The grant of bail was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>