https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189398 Compensation for land containing deep pits was not further enhanced because the land required development before it could be treated on par with levelled land, and comparable awards at the same rate had already attained finality. The High Court had considered the material facts, including the disparity between pit land and levelled land, and fixed a uniform rate of Rs. 7,000 per bigha. In the absence of compelling material to disturb that assessment, the challenge to the compensation determination failed. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:55:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189398 Compensation for land containing deep pits was not further enhanced because the land required development before it could be treated on par with levelled land, and comparable awards at the same rate had already attained finality. The High Court had considered the material facts, including the disparity between pit land and levelled land, and fixed a uniform rate of Rs. 7,000 per bigha. In the absence of compelling material to disturb that assessment, the challenge to the compensation determination failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189398