https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189397 A zoning and reservation order under the Essential Commodities Act was treated as supply regulation, not a compulsory sale order under Section 3(2)(f); market-rate payment under Section 3(3)(c) therefore did not apply. The zonal price fixed for sugarcane in the reserved area was held to bind non-members as well, because the pricing scheme operated uniformly for all growers in the zone and did not create separate legal prices for members and non-members. The absence of an express mechanism for individual hearings before price fixation did not invalidate the scheme, since individual hearings were impracticable and the fixation was not shown to be arbitrary. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:43:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189397 A zoning and reservation order under the Essential Commodities Act was treated as supply regulation, not a compulsory sale order under Section 3(2)(f); market-rate payment under Section 3(3)(c) therefore did not apply. The zonal price fixed for sugarcane in the reserved area was held to bind non-members as well, because the pricing scheme operated uniformly for all growers in the zone and did not create separate legal prices for members and non-members. The absence of an express mechanism for individual hearings before price fixation did not invalidate the scheme, since individual hearings were impracticable and the fixation was not shown to be arbitrary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189397