<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189396</link>
    <description>Where a detention order rests on a single ground, failure to place the detenu&#039;s timely retraction of a confessional statement before the detaining authority vitiates the subjective satisfaction on which detention depends. The retraction, made the next day and known to the authority, went to the basis of the material relied on, so its omission was not a mere irregularity. Section 5A of the COFEPOSA Act had no application because the detention was founded on a single ground, and the order was liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189396</link>
      <description>Where a detention order rests on a single ground, failure to place the detenu&#039;s timely retraction of a confessional statement before the detaining authority vitiates the subjective satisfaction on which detention depends. The retraction, made the next day and known to the authority, went to the basis of the material relied on, so its omission was not a mere irregularity. Section 5A of the COFEPOSA Act had no application because the detention was founded on a single ground, and the order was liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>