https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189395 Article 22(5) requires communication of the basic facts and materials forming the grounds of detention within the prescribed time, while further particulars or subsidiary details may be supplied with reasonable expedition depending on the circumstances. The commentary notes that, where the grounds are elaborate and the requested material is spread across a bulky record, delay in furnishing copies will not automatically vitiate detention if the core facts were timely communicated. It also highlights that delay in arranging lawyer consultation is assessed in context, including public interest concerns and whether the detainee later received the facility and still made no representation. On these facts, the delay was held not unreasonable. en-us Mon, 04 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:26:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189395 Article 22(5) requires communication of the basic facts and materials forming the grounds of detention within the prescribed time, while further particulars or subsidiary details may be supplied with reasonable expedition depending on the circumstances. The commentary notes that, where the grounds are elaborate and the requested material is spread across a bulky record, delay in furnishing copies will not automatically vitiate detention if the core facts were timely communicated. It also highlights that delay in arranging lawyer consultation is assessed in context, including public interest concerns and whether the detainee later received the facility and still made no representation. On these facts, the delay was held not unreasonable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189395