<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 605 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189384</link>
    <description>The settlement was reached between the parties in the case involving a suit for trademark infringement. The appeal against the dismissal of the review application and the challenge to the original decree were listed together. A settlement was recorded in court, resulting in the dismissal of the review appeal and the suit being decreed in favor of the respondent based on compromise terms. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs in the suit and appeal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 10:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 605 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189384</link>
      <description>The settlement was reached between the parties in the case involving a suit for trademark infringement. The appeal against the dismissal of the review application and the challenge to the original decree were listed together. A settlement was recorded in court, resulting in the dismissal of the review appeal and the suit being decreed in favor of the respondent based on compromise terms. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs in the suit and appeal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>