<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 456 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the disallowance of CENVAT credit was not justified. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to provide adequate evidence to prove the alleged misuse of CENVAT credit. It was emphasized that there was a lack of independent inquiry and corroborative evidence, leading to the conclusion that the disallowance did not impact the taxable income of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 10:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 456 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the disallowance of CENVAT credit was not justified. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to provide adequate evidence to prove the alleged misuse of CENVAT credit. It was emphasized that there was a lack of independent inquiry and corroborative evidence, leading to the conclusion that the disallowance did not impact the taxable income of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>