<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 448 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337368</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, adjusting the profit element addition. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned in the interest of justice. Concerns about non-genuine purchases were addressed, with a 15% profit element addition upheld. Double taxation was avoided by recognizing that the disputed amount had already been taxed in a subsequent year. The profit element addition was reduced to 2% based on evidence of better gross profit rates presented by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 448 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337368</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, adjusting the profit element addition. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned in the interest of justice. Concerns about non-genuine purchases were addressed, with a 15% profit element addition upheld. Double taxation was avoided by recognizing that the disputed amount had already been taxed in a subsequent year. The profit element addition was reduced to 2% based on evidence of better gross profit rates presented by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>