<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the respondent, allowing the respondent to avail Cenvat credit based on the duty paid on goods procured from M/s. Satya Metals. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the denial of Cenvat credit was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the respondent had paid duty on the goods and was entitled to the credit as per the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 10:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the respondent, allowing the respondent to avail Cenvat credit based on the duty paid on goods procured from M/s. Satya Metals. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the denial of Cenvat credit was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the respondent had paid duty on the goods and was entitled to the credit as per the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>