<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 404 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that revoked the courier registration and forfeited the security deposit. The courier registration of the appellant was restored with consequential relief, recognizing that the punishment already suffered was sufficient. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 404 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that revoked the courier registration and forfeited the security deposit. The courier registration of the appellant was restored with consequential relief, recognizing that the punishment already suffered was sufficient. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>