<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 400 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337320</link>
    <description>Section 23B(d) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was construed strictly according to its plain language: the ninety per cent reduction applied only to the interest on tax, while the liability relating to penalty and interest thereon was not expanded into a broader waiver by implication. The petitioner&#039;s wider computation of amnesty relief was therefore rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s interpretation was upheld in principle. The text also indicates that, because the assessment position had later changed, the Commercial Tax Officer could take a fresh decision in light of the judgment and subsequent developments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 400 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337320</link>
      <description>Section 23B(d) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was construed strictly according to its plain language: the ninety per cent reduction applied only to the interest on tax, while the liability relating to penalty and interest thereon was not expanded into a broader waiver by implication. The petitioner&#039;s wider computation of amnesty relief was therefore rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s interpretation was upheld in principle. The text also indicates that, because the assessment position had later changed, the Commercial Tax Officer could take a fresh decision in light of the judgment and subsequent developments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>