<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 398 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337318</link>
    <description>In preventive detention under COFEPOSA, &quot;grounds&quot; means the primary facts forming the basis of subjective satisfaction, and severability under Section 5A applies where the detention order rests on distinct independent activities rather than one indivisible ground. The Court held that the record disclosed multiple separate grounds, so invalidity of one ground would not vitiate the entire order if others survived. It also held that non-supply of some relied upon documents and the resulting Article 22(5) complaint did not bar reliance on Section 5A where independent grounds remained valid. The detention order was sustained on the surviving grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 398 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337318</link>
      <description>In preventive detention under COFEPOSA, &quot;grounds&quot; means the primary facts forming the basis of subjective satisfaction, and severability under Section 5A applies where the detention order rests on distinct independent activities rather than one indivisible ground. The Court held that the record disclosed multiple separate grounds, so invalidity of one ground would not vitiate the entire order if others survived. It also held that non-supply of some relied upon documents and the resulting Article 22(5) complaint did not bar reliance on Section 5A where independent grounds remained valid. The detention order was sustained on the surviving grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>