<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 698 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189370</link>
    <description>In block assessments, explained funds and verified receipts available during the block period may be telescoped against additions for unexplained investments or expenditure, even without a strict one-to-one nexus, if the availability of funds is established. Additions based only on xerox copies, rough slips, or an uncorroborated search admission are not justified where the seized material does not establish the assessee&#039;s investment or ownership. Relief was recognised for explained items such as HUF withdrawals, refunded advances, gold, shop investment, and certain land or marriage-related transactions, while unproved balances and unsupported claims remained liable to addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 698 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189370</link>
      <description>In block assessments, explained funds and verified receipts available during the block period may be telescoped against additions for unexplained investments or expenditure, even without a strict one-to-one nexus, if the availability of funds is established. Additions based only on xerox copies, rough slips, or an uncorroborated search admission are not justified where the seized material does not establish the assessee&#039;s investment or ownership. Relief was recognised for explained items such as HUF withdrawals, refunded advances, gold, shop investment, and certain land or marriage-related transactions, while unproved balances and unsupported claims remained liable to addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>