<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1012 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189366</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the SC dismissed the civil appeal on the facts and circumstances of the case while expressly keeping the question of law open. The order does not decide the underlying central excise issue on merits and records no substantive legal determination beyond the dismissal of the appeal in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1012 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189366</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the SC dismissed the civil appeal on the facts and circumstances of the case while expressly keeping the question of law open. The order does not decide the underlying central excise issue on merits and records no substantive legal determination beyond the dismissal of the appeal in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>