<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 1005 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189363</link>
    <description>Reasonableness of manufacturing loss or bottle breakage was assessed on the factual record, with the Tribunal accepting that the admitted breakage percentage was reasonable and extending the benefit of doubt to the manufacturer. The manufacturer had regularly reported breakage to the Excise Department, while the department had an opportunity to inspect the bonded storeroom but did not do so. On that basis, the Tribunal upheld the breakage norm and dismissed the departmental appeal, and the High Court found no substantial question of law to justify interference, so the appeal was summarily dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 1005 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189363</link>
      <description>Reasonableness of manufacturing loss or bottle breakage was assessed on the factual record, with the Tribunal accepting that the admitted breakage percentage was reasonable and extending the benefit of doubt to the manufacturer. The manufacturer had regularly reported breakage to the Excise Department, while the department had an opportunity to inspect the bonded storeroom but did not do so. On that basis, the Tribunal upheld the breakage norm and dismissed the departmental appeal, and the High Court found no substantial question of law to justify interference, so the appeal was summarily dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>