<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1153 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189355</link>
    <description>Iron ore fines arising as process waste during manufacture of sponge iron, and cleared on payment of duty, were held not to be exempted goods for Rule 6 reversal under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal treated the controversy as already settled in favour of assessees and distinguished the Revenue&#039;s relied-upon precedent on its facts. As process waste cannot be equated with exempted final goods merely because common input services were used for dutiable and non-dutiable outputs, the demand and consequential penalty under Rule 15 were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:22:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1153 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189355</link>
      <description>Iron ore fines arising as process waste during manufacture of sponge iron, and cleared on payment of duty, were held not to be exempted goods for Rule 6 reversal under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal treated the controversy as already settled in favour of assessees and distinguished the Revenue&#039;s relied-upon precedent on its facts. As process waste cannot be equated with exempted final goods merely because common input services were used for dutiable and non-dutiable outputs, the demand and consequential penalty under Rule 15 were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>