<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest on a loan from SIDBI, as the shares acquired were not connected to the appellant&#039;s business purpose. The interest paid was deemed not allowable under relevant sections of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the disallowance of an unexplained liability was affirmed due to a variance in outstanding balances and lack of evidence provided by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 4th January 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:43:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest on a loan from SIDBI, as the shares acquired were not connected to the appellant&#039;s business purpose. The interest paid was deemed not allowable under relevant sections of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the disallowance of an unexplained liability was affirmed due to a variance in outstanding balances and lack of evidence provided by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 4th January 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>