<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 391 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the classification of interest income as income from other sources and not as business income. It confirmed that the enhancement by the CIT(A) did not introduce a new source of income. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3), stating that no further disallowance should occur once income is assessed under section 44AF.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 391 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the classification of interest income as income from other sources and not as business income. It confirmed that the enhancement by the CIT(A) did not introduce a new source of income. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3), stating that no further disallowance should occur once income is assessed under section 44AF.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>