<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6358</link>
    <description>In a c.i.f. sale financed by an irrevocable letter of credit, property in unascertained goods passes when the seller unconditionally appropriates the goods to the contract by shipping them and tendering the bill of lading and related documents against payment, without reserving the right of disposal. Rights allowing the buyer to reject for non-conformity or to claim for quality or moisture defects do not, by themselves, postpone transfer of title, because they do not make inspection or acceptance a condition precedent to passing of property. On that basis, the sales were treated as having taken place outside India, and the profits were treated as arising outside India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:38:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6358</link>
      <description>In a c.i.f. sale financed by an irrevocable letter of credit, property in unascertained goods passes when the seller unconditionally appropriates the goods to the contract by shipping them and tendering the bill of lading and related documents against payment, without reserving the right of disposal. Rights allowing the buyer to reject for non-conformity or to claim for quality or moisture defects do not, by themselves, postpone transfer of title, because they do not make inspection or acceptance a condition precedent to passing of property. On that basis, the sales were treated as having taken place outside India, and the profits were treated as arising outside India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>