https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337297 The Tribunal remanded the case for re-quantification of the demand based on the observations, disposing of the appeal. The appellant's plea of limitation was rejected due to the suppression of material facts, justifying the extended period of limitation. The Tribunal agreed with the Department's position on the Works Contract Composition Scheme benefit, remanding the matter for further consideration by the Adjudicating Authority. The disputed contracts were deemed to involve construction services, and the demand for service tax was not sustainable before a specific date as per the Supreme Court's decision. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:41:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337297 The Tribunal remanded the case for re-quantification of the demand based on the observations, disposing of the appeal. The appellant's plea of limitation was rejected due to the suppression of material facts, justifying the extended period of limitation. The Tribunal agreed with the Department's position on the Works Contract Composition Scheme benefit, remanding the matter for further consideration by the Adjudicating Authority. The disputed contracts were deemed to involve construction services, and the demand for service tax was not sustainable before a specific date as per the Supreme Court's decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337297