https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337294 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the provisions of Rule 9/10(a) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 were not applicable to interconnected undertakings being related persons. Consequently, the proceedings initiated against the appellants were deemed unsustainable, and the impugned orders were set aside. The appeals and stay applications were allowed, emphasizing the importance of accurate interpretation and application of relevant legal provisions in excise duty valuation cases. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337294 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the provisions of Rule 9/10(a) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 were not applicable to interconnected undertakings being related persons. Consequently, the proceedings initiated against the appellants were deemed unsustainable, and the impugned orders were set aside. The appeals and stay applications were allowed, emphasizing the importance of accurate interpretation and application of relevant legal provisions in excise duty valuation cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337294