https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337291 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower authorities' decision that the appellant was not eligible for small scale exemption due to manufacturing and clearing goods under another entity's brand name "Archies." Despite the appellant's arguments, evidence of substantial quantities of goods with the brand name, a civil suit with the brand owner, and a settlement agreement supported the respondent's case. The appellant's failure to prove innocence in using the brand name led to the appeal's dismissal. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337291 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower authorities' decision that the appellant was not eligible for small scale exemption due to manufacturing and clearing goods under another entity's brand name "Archies." Despite the appellant's arguments, evidence of substantial quantities of goods with the brand name, a civil suit with the brand owner, and a settlement agreement supported the respondent's case. The appellant's failure to prove innocence in using the brand name led to the appeal's dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337291