<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337290</link>
    <description>A Central Government public sector undertaking was treated as a government company because the President of India held 63.06% of its share capital and the Ministry controlled director appointments and managerial affairs. On that basis, it fell within paragraph 6.1 of Chapter 14 of the CBEC Manual, not paragraph 6.2, and was therefore entitled to provisional assessment without executing a bond or furnishing a bank guarantee. The departmental insistence on an enhanced bond and bank guarantee was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337290</link>
      <description>A Central Government public sector undertaking was treated as a government company because the President of India held 63.06% of its share capital and the Ministry controlled director appointments and managerial affairs. On that basis, it fell within paragraph 6.1 of Chapter 14 of the CBEC Manual, not paragraph 6.2, and was therefore entitled to provisional assessment without executing a bond or furnishing a bank guarantee. The departmental insistence on an enhanced bond and bank guarantee was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>